![[Darth Jobs]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkZxwoEsUOgacbesOMNlOxoHxErtZZCsDB5-8Jg3p45h1j41mm5gxxtkguXdHjkylgzG5seU5jXK7ut5zQbdkwKTyzE4ppSybbHti5A5lV2_Tb-sCjEoFWZA2UZbAe61pJpTl1ZcjIESw/s200/DarthJobs.jpeg)
I agree these are interesting stories (after all, I blogged 80% of them), but does that really make Apple a dominant force in the industry?
![[Borg Gates]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhltyOKUjV9__yf4f085_4vx605lkHnJ00g8KBFbFb_IU16nAUAtVep6ChtWso3wiv6EcV2gA6b_Ej_XlLnunUQKt4IB7gO3MQ_6cSi_G2H-NREeu5xxdD5vjktCiOB5T6FEnOBPi2zeiM/s320/BorgGates.jpeg)
Perhaps it is plausible that Gates’ influence has been reduced. But the more relevant question is: who is more likely to achieve total world domination, Gates or Jobs? If I looked at a straight linear trend line, I’d have to say Eric Schmidt has the best hand.
Interestingly, if you believe Wikipedia, Jobs, Schmidt and Gates were all born in 1955. So at 51 (Jobs turns 52 on Feb. 24), they all have an edge on Azim Premji, who might otherwise be a contender if he weren’t so close to retirement.
PS: Apologies to regular readers (all five of you) for not posting for 130 hours. While I’ve been meeting my teaching commitments, deadlines on a research paper (finally) took priority over blogging.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are promoting a website or otherwise not responsive to the post will be deleted.