Brown is washing his hands of the critical problem that cost Ed Zander his job. In effect, he's saying that either a) the handset division is a net negative for the stock price or b) the best way to sell it is to cast it loose and make it the new management's problem.
A number of the articles noted what a terrible idea it is to dump Motorola's largest business rather than fix it. Dow Jones (via CNN) has a good take:
Skeptics believe that, over the next year, Motorola will endure customer confusion, interruptions with the supply chain, and ultimately the loss of more market share. More importantly, a lack of stable leadership has left the mobile devices business without clear direction, which is only exacerbated by the uncertainty of a spinoff.As DJ notes, even with a spinoff the new division will need a leader, strategy and a way to keep its top talent.
“It's a terrible idea,” said James Faucette, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities. “It hastens the demise of the handset business.”
CNET has an intriguing article in which a disgruntled ex-employee basic says that Motorola's success with the RAZR could be all credited to Chief Marketing Officer Geoffrey Frost — and when Frost died on the job in 2005, so did Motorola’s stream of good ideas.
Carl Icahn — the master of short-term arbitrage and long-term disaster — seems to think the spinoff is good news. I think the stupidity of this strategy — dumping rather than fixing the problems — will become obvious long before Icahn can dump his 144 million shares.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are promoting a website or otherwise not responsive to the post will be deleted.